Learning Model based on Multiple Intelligences oriented towards Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) through the application of Visual, Auditory, Read-Write Preferential, Kinesthetic (VARK), and Directed Reading Listening Thinking Activity (DRLTA) in Elementary School

Authors

  • Suhartono Suhartono Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia
  • Hanafi Hanafi Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia
  • Cici Murniasih Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia
  • Moch. Noviadi Nugroho UIN Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/rissej.v3i1.257

Keywords:

Multiple Intelligence, Visual Critical Thinking, Auditory, Preferential Read-Write, Kinesthetic (VARK), Directed Reading Listening Thinking Activity (DRLTA)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a learning model based on multiple intelligences and students' critical thinking skills through visual, auditory, preferential read-write, kinesthetic (VARK) learning strategies, and the application of the directed reading listening thinking activity (DRLTA) model to elementary school students. The stages include: 1) formulating research problems and determining survey objectives, 2) determining concepts and hypotheses and digging literature, 3) sampling, 4) making kueisoner, 5) field work, 6) data processing, 7) analysis and reporting. The result of the need assessment score is 3.54, the product development stage, FGD, expert and practitioner validation and the field trial stage. The feasibility of this model is tested based on: 1) The assessment of psychologists is assessed based on three aspects, namely the elements of the supporting theory used, the elements of the learning stages and the elements of the implementation of learning techniques to get a score of 4.77 or including "very feasible" to use. 2) Assessment of education practitioners is also assessed based on three aspects of getting a score of 4.33 or including "very feasible" to use. 3) Field trial assessment based on four aspects, namely, Multiple Intelligences detection, learning methods and learning media. Field trials were carried out with the individual trial stage getting a score of 3.56 including "very feasible", group field trials resulting in a score of 3.59 including "very feasible" and limited field trials getting a score of 3.8 including "very feasible" to use. The framework in this study is based on quantitative and qualitative research in accordance with the objectives to be achieved, the research problems to be solved, and the nature of the data required. The use of a mixed method approach is based on research coverage and research problems. In accordance with the objectives and research problems and the nature of the data collected, this study used a two phase design. The reason for using this design is that it allows theoretically and practically the development of two designs in a position to complement each other, equal, and be implemented sequentially.

References

Armstrong, Thomas. (2009). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom: 3rd edition. Virginia. ASCD.

Baum, Susan., Viens, Julie., & Slatin, Barbara. (2005). Multiple Intelligences in the Elementary Classroom. New York. Teacher College, Columbia University.

Budiningsih, Asri C. (2005). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.

Campbell, L., Campbell, B., & Dickinson, D. (1996). Teaching and Learning through Multiple Intelligences. Needham Heights, MA. Allyn & Bacon.

Dallas Independent School District,1995, Visual-auditory-kinesthetic (V.A.K.) Multisensory Phonics: K- 3 Teacher Guide, the District

DePorter, Bobbi. 2004. Quantum learning: membiasakan belajar nyaman dan menyenangkan. Bandung: Kaifa.

Fleming, Neil D. 2001. Teaching and Learning Styles: VARK Strategies. N.D. Fleming.

Jeral, Kim M. 2010. The Influence of Visual, Auditory, and Kinesthetic Learning Opportunities. Southwest Minnesota State University.

Fleetham, Mike. (2006). Multiple Intelligences in Practice Enhancing Self-Esteem and Learning in the Classroom. Stafford. Network Continum Education.

Gardner, Howard. (1993a). Frames of Mind; The Theory of Multiple Intelligences-10th anniversary edition. New York. Basic Books.

_______________(1993b). Multiple Intelligences. The Theory in Practice. New York. Basic Books.

Hoerr, Thomas R. (2000). Becoming a Multiple Intelligences School. Virginia. ASCD.

Huberman, A.M. dan Miles, M. B. (1985). Qualitative Data Analysis; a Sourcebook of New Methods. London. Sage Publications.

Jasmine, Julia. (2012). Profesional’s Guide Teaching with Multiple Intelligences (Metode Mengajar Multiple Intelligences) (Terj). Bandung. Nuansa Cendekia.

Kuhns, Bradley W. 1987. Mind/Body Therapy, Auditory, Visual, Kinesthetic, Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP), An Additional Communications Approach for Psychotherapists, Counselors and Law Enforcement.

Lazear, David G. (1992). Teaching for Multiple Intelligences. Indiana. Phi Delta Kappa Education Foundation.

McKenzie, Walter. (2005). Multiple Intelligences and Instructional Technology. Washington. International Society for Technology in Education.

Moleong. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung. Remaja Rosdakarya

Muhaimin. (2003). Arah Baru Pengembangan Pendidikan Islam. Pemberdayaan, Pengembangan Kurikulum hingga Redefinisasi Islamisasi Pengetahuan. Bandung. Nuansa Cendekia.

Pasak, Taufik. (2007). Brain Management for Self Improvement. Bandung. Mizan.

Pupuh Fathurohman dan M. Sobry Sutikno. 2010. Strategi Belajar Mengajar Melalui Penanaman Konsep Umum & Islam. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Rasydianah, Andi. (1995). Butir-Butir Pengarahan Dirjen Bimbaga Islam pada Acara Pelatihan Peningkatan Wawasan Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Kependidikan Bagi Dosen Pendidikan Agama Islam pada Perguruan Tinggi Umum. Bandung, 11 September 1995.

Rose, C dan Nichol, M.J. (2001). Accelerated Learning for the 21st century (Cara Belajar Cepat Abad XXI). Penerjemahah; Dedi Ahimsa. Bandung. Nuansa Kerjasama dengan Pusat Perbukuan Depdiknas.

Salim, Agus. (2006). Teori & Paradigma Penelitian Sosial. Buku Sumber untuk Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta. Tiara Wacana.

Semiawan, Conny. (1999). Pendidikan Tinggi, Peningkatan Kemampuan Manusia Sepanjang Hayat Seoptimal Mungkin. Jakarta. Depdikbud. Dirjen Dikti

Suparno, Paul. (1997). Filsafat Konstruktivisme dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta. Kanisius.

Syukri. (2003). Pendidikan Islam dalam Konteks Politik Pendidikan Nasional. Jurnal Ulumuna. 7 (12).

Tomlinson, Carol Ann. (1999). The Differentiated Classroom. Responding to the Needs of All Learners. Virginia. Ascd.

Tri Gunadi. 2010.Optimalkan Otak Kanan, Otak Kiri, Otak Tengah, dan Otak Kecil. Jakarta: Penebar Plus.

Yaumi, Muhammad. (2012). Pembelajaran Berbasis Multiple Intelligences. Jakarta. Dian Rakyat.

Yin, Robert K..(1994). Case Study Research; Design and Methods. Newbury Park CA. Sage Publication.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Suhartono, S., Hanafi, H., Murniasih, C., & Nugroho, M. N. (2025). Learning Model based on Multiple Intelligences oriented towards Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) through the application of Visual, Auditory, Read-Write Preferential, Kinesthetic (VARK), and Directed Reading Listening Thinking Activity (DRLTA) in Elementary School. Research and Innovation in Social Science Education Journal (RISSEJ), 3(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.30595/rissej.v3i1.257

Issue

Section

Articles