Reflecting social status and relationships

Social deixis in Muhammad: The Last Prophet (2002)

Authors

  • La Afrina Atsiil SD Muhammadiyah Demangan Yogyakarta
  • Bambang Hariyanto UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/pjh.v1i2.438

Keywords:

Social deixis, Fillmore’s theory, speech level

Abstract

This study examines the use of social deixis in the film Muhammad: The Last Prophet (2002). The film remains relevant to contemporary contexts as it offers important lessons on how effective communication is constructed in society, particularly among individuals of diverse social statuses. Social deixis refers to the linguistic means by which social relationships and communicative contexts are reflected in language. The aim of this study is to identify the types of social deixis used in the film and to describe their functions. Adopting a descriptive qualitative approach, the data were collected from dialogues in the film and analyzed based on Fillmore’s (1975) theory of social deixis. The analysis focuses on five types of social deixis: person marking, speech level, honorifics (including names, titles, and kinship terms), social acts, and linguistic performance. The findings indicate that social deixis in the film is realized through various linguistic forms and is shaped by factors such as participants, social relationships, and the communicative context. Furthermore, the use of social deixis reflects differences in social status and relationships among the characters. In conclusion, social deixis plays an essential role in conveying social meaning and shaping interpersonal interactions within the film.

References

Atsiil, La Afrina. (2025). Social Deixis in The Film Muhammad: The Last Prophet (2002), [Thesis]. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). UK: SAGE Publications.

Fillmore, C. J. (1975). Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis 1971. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistic Club.

Hariyanto, Bambang. (2023). “A Discourse Analysis of Islam Nusantara in Said Agil Siradj’s Speeches”. [Doctoral Thesis]. Western Sydney University. https://researchers.westernsydney.edu.au/en/studentTheses/a-discourse-analysis-of-islam-nusantara-in-said-agil-siradjs-spee/.

Hale, Sandra & Napier, Jemina. (2013). Research Method in Interpreting: Practical Resource. London: Bloomsbury.

Khoeroh, Kholifatul. (2020). “Social Deixis in Malcolm X (1992) Film”. [Thesis]. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.

Levinson, Stephen C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Litosseliti, Lia (Edited) (2010). Research Method in Linguistics. Great Britain: Bloomsbury.

Merriam, S., B., & Tisdell, E., J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Moleong, P.L. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Kuatitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nasution, Abdul Fattah. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: CV. Harfa Creative.

Noerrofi’a, Igaratu, & Bahri, Saeful. (2019). The Analysis of Social Deixis in the Film Beauty and the Beast. Journal of PIONEER, 11(1), 12-20. https://unars.ac.id/ojs/index.php/pioneer/indexing.

Purwo, Bambang Kaswanti. (1984). Deksis Dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PN Balai Pustaka.

Salam, Hafizh Fachriza. (2023). “Social Deixis Used by Kumail Nanjani in The Big Sick (2017)”. [Thesis]. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/66118/

Yule, George. (1996). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

11.06.2026

How to Cite

Atsiil, L. A. ., & Hariyanto, B. (2026). Reflecting social status and relationships: Social deixis in Muhammad: The Last Prophet (2002). Proposisi: Journal of Humanities, 1(2), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.30595/pjh.v1i2.438

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories