Between Growth and Green: Rethinking the Politics of Decoupling in Emerging Economies

Authors

  • Muhammad Qeyas Universitas Islam International Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/jesh.v3i2.327

Keywords:

Decoupling, Green Economy, Emerging Economies, Climate Policy, Environmental Degradation, Postcolonial Development, Sustainability Justice, Circular Economy, Comparative Policy Analysis, Renewable Energy Transition

Abstract

With the rising environmental crisis, guided by growing economic interests, the notion of decoupling economic growth and environmental degradation has become a mainstream idea across the world. A sense of pressure is emerging in economies like Indonesia, which are compelled to grow by complying with sustainability goals, highlighting a profound need to re-evaluate whether decoupling is a viable and fair approach. This paper examines the political, structural, and institutional feasibility of absolute decoupling by conducting a comparison between policy frameworks in developed and emerging economies, such as Denmark, Sweden, China, and Indonesia. The study employs a qualitative comparative policy analysis and thematic review to discuss how green growth approaches, including the concepts of a circular economy and transitions to renewable energy, are converted into practice. The results indicate that while countries such as Denmark and Sweden has made notable progress, Indonesia continues to face structural barriers, policy incoherence, and budgetary constraints. The research indicates that the concept of decoupling, as it is presented, is possibly a type of ecological idealism that overlooks history, economics, and geopolitics in the Global South. It proposes a new understanding of prosperity, advocating an understanding of sustainability that has a justice orientation beyond GDP-oriented growth. Decoupling should move beyond a technical undertaking to a political initiative, one based on planetary boundaries, socio-economic fairness, and post-colonial political independence.

References

Adebayo, T. S., Agboola, M. O., Rjoub, H., Adeshola, I., Agyekum, E. B., & Kumar, N. M. (2021).

Linking economic growth, urbanization, and environmental degradation in China: What is the role of hydroelectricity consumption? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 6975.

Arinanto, D. P. S., & Napitupulu, V. (2022). The green economy and decentralization of natural resources

management (DNRM) policy in Indonesia under the international law framework: Quo vadis? IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1111(1), 012087. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1111/1/012087

Berahab, R. (2017). Decoupling economic growth from CO₂ emissions in the world.

Bithas, K., & Kalimeris, P. (2018). Unmasking decoupling: Redefining the resource intensity of the economy.

Science of the Total Environment, 619–620, 338–351.

Canton, H. (2021). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development—OECD. In The Europa

Directory of International Organizations 2021 (pp. 677–687). Routledge.

Conrad, E., & Cassar, L. F. (2014). Decoupling economic growth and environmental degradation: Reviewing

progress to date in the small island state of Malta. Sustainability, 6(10), 6729–6750.

Costanza, R., & Daly, H. E. (1992). Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology, 6(1),

–46.

Danish Energy Agency (DEA). (2024). Energipolitik og data. https://ens.dk/en

Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS),(2023). UK energy and climate change policy.

European Environment Agency. (2014). Resource efficiency and environmental impacts.

https://www.edie.net/eea-to-focus-on-resource-efficiency-in-2014/

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2022). Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate

change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/

International Labour Office. (2018). World employment and social outlook 2018: Greening with jobs.

International Labour Organization.

Jackson, T. (2011). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet.

https://www.environmentandsociety.org/mml/prosperity-without-growth-economics-finite-planet

Jong, H. N. (2023). Indonesia’s “food estate” program repeating failures of past projects. Mongabay.

https://news.mongabay.com/2023/04/report-indonesias-food-estate-program-repeating-failures-of-past-projects/

Kerschner, C. (2019). Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability.

European Environmental Bureau. https://eeb.org/library/evidence-and-arguments-against-green-growth/

Kumar, A. (2020). CBD’s global biodiversity outlook 5: Final assessment of Aichi biodiversity targets and

beyond. Asian Biotechnology & Development Review, 22.

Mayo, F. (2024). The UK’s journey to a coal power phase-out. Department for Energy Security and Net Zero.

Mai, S. (2024). Decoupling economic growth from carbon emissions: How have Chinese provinces performed

in green growth over time? Applied and Computational Engineering, 61, 155–168. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/61/20240951

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2017). Green growth indicators 2017.

https://www.oecd.org/environment/green-growth-indicators-2017-9789264268586-en.htm

Pendic, Z. R., Pendić, P. S. Z., Jakovljević, B. B., Polak, M. M., Živković, M. N., & Marković, Ž. M. (2019).

Energy efficiency: Examples of which less talk. Tehnika, 74(6), 885–895.

Ray, D., & Ing, L. Y. (2016). Addressing Indonesia’s infrastructure deficit. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic

Studies, 52(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2016.1162266

Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., ... & Foley, J. A. (2009). A

safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475.

Schandl, H., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Wiedmann, T., Geschke, A., Cai, Y., West, J., ... & Owen, A. (2016). Decoupling global environmental pressure and economic growth: Scenarios for energy use, materials use and

carbon emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 132, 45–56.

Schneider, P., Folkens, L., Zigann, J., & Fauk, T. (2024). Der Teaching-Research-Practice Nexus als

Implementierungsrahmen für Klimaschutz am Beispiel der Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal. In Lernziele und Kompetenzen im Bereich Nachhaltigkeit (pp. 1–24). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Stern, N. H. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge University Press.Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA). (2023). https://www.naturvardsverket.se/en/

United Nations Environment Programme – International Resource Panel. (2011). Decoupling natural resource

use and environmental impacts from economic growth. UNEP/Earthprint.

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2011). Report on atmosphere and air pollution.

https://www.unep.org/resources/report/report-atmosphere-and-air-pollution

Wang, J., Shan, Y., Cui, C., Zhao, C., Meng, J., & Wang, S. (2024). Investigating the fast energy-related carbon

emissions growth in African countries and its drivers. Applied Energy, 357, 122494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122494

Wang, S., Sun, L., & Iqbal, S. (2022). Green financing role on renewable energy dependence and energy

transition in E7 economies. Renewable Energy, 200, 1561–1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.10.067

Webster, K. (2015). The circular economy: A wealth of flows. Ellen MacArthur Foundation Publishing.

World Economic Forum. (2020). The global risks report 2020.

https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2020

World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). Preventing disease through healthy environments.

https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565196

Yamaguchi, Y. (2022). Japan’s energy efficiency and conservation policies.

Zuhra, A., & Sabirin, A. (2024). How do international economic laws impact sustainable development goals?

ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan, 18(2), 127–15.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-31

How to Cite

Muhammad Qeyas. (2025). Between Growth and Green: Rethinking the Politics of Decoupling in Emerging Economies. Journal of Economics, Social, and Humanities, 3(2), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.30595/jesh.v3i2.327